Posts tagged India

Licit but illegal wool

The Indo-Canadian newspaper Link reports a rise of cross-border smuggling between the PRC and India. For the second time in 13 month, the police have arrested smugglers in Kinnaur near the porous border with Tibet.

Police on Monday seized two trucks laden with costly pashmina wool that was smuggled from Chinese villages to Indian border. The estimated cost of the seized wool is pegged at around Rs 1.5 crore in the international market.

We are not talking about drugs or weapons or endangered species here – just wool, carefully combed from the belly of Himalayan mountain goats. No animals are hurt and no international conservation laws are violated. Pashmina is widely known as Kashmir precicely because there is a long tradition of trade between Tibet and India. Since the Sino-Indian border war in 1962 the border is closed and trade is outlawed. As there is no official border crossing and no customs office, any cross-border trade becomes an act of smuggling. But pashmina is still an important source of income for Tibetan herders, and the most logical trade routes are still the ones to India.

Five tons of pashmina – that makes a caravan of one hundred mules that crossed over from Tibet. This is hardly a clandestine operation but rather a classical case of what Willem van Schendel and Abraham Itty have described in the volume Illicit flows and criminal things: cross-border trade that is not considered illicit by the communities engaging in it, yet technically remains illegal. My guess is that somebody has not received what he or she considered a fair share in makeing such a transaction possible. Rs 1.5 crore are more then USD 300,000. This is a considerable loss, and in all likelyhood it was not some rich crime syncidate that suffered it. I know of a very similar story in which a village collectively invested in such a deal and lost most of their savings when their goods were confiscated at the Indian border. That was more than ten years ago and the village still suffers from it.

The report goes on to mentions that “sources said that cops have also found some quantity of shatoosh wool”. Shatoosh wool is from poached Tibetan antilopes – an endangered species. Unlike Pashmina, it is banned from international trade. But the logic at work here equates the illegality and illicitness of poaching to the long-standing tradition of trans-Himalayan trade.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More on Detained Pilgrims

Tibetan pilgrims returning from the Kalachakra initiation in India at the beginning of January have faced various difficulties (see previous posts here and here). Now, it seems that many of them are still in detention and subjected to political reeducation. Apparently, many of the pilgrims are government officials. Tendar Tsering reports for Phayul:

“The Chinese government has warned Tibetan officials in Chinese occupied Tibet of serious actions and harsh punishments if they failed to return home before February 15,” Kalsang Gyaltsen, a Member of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile said.

According to Human Rights Watch this may be the first time since the 1970 that such a large number of lay people are being detained.
Between 7,000 and 8,000 pilgrims had received the permission to leave the country for Nepal and the authorities must clearly have known where they were heading for. Most seem to have had passports and valid Nepalese visas.

A number of them also traveled directly to India using visas issued by India, indicating that on this occasion the Chinese authorities had not placed restrictions on travel to India in Tibetans’ passports, as in the past. There is no known regulation banning Tibetans from attending the teachings, and the returnees undergoing re-education have not been accused of any crime, such as carrying illicit documents or crossing the Chinese border without permission.
There are no reports so far that any of the estimated 700 ethnic Chinese from China who attended the Dalai Lama’s teachings in Bihar have been detained on their return to China, suggesting that the detainees are being selected because of their ethnicity.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , | Leave a comment

Agreement or disagreement?

Two weeks ago, India and China have signed an agreement to prevent flare-ups along their disputed Himalayan border. Now, Saubarah Shukla (Daily Mail) reports that the talks actually ended in a deadlock.

Menon, a former envoy to Beijing and an old China hand in India’s national security set-up, argued that under article 3 of the guiding principles of the Sino-Indian boundary discussions, all sectors (eastern, western and middle) needed to be discussed and a package solution required to be thrashed out. India argued that the western sector in Jammu and Kashmir, which includes the Aksai Chin area, should be discussed along with the eastern portion of the boundary. 

Under a previously agreed principle, the two sides had concurred in 2005 that settled population would not be disturbed. New Delhi articulated this, too, at the meeting.

India claims Chinese controlled territory in Western Tibet and Xinjiang (Aksai Chin, including the Karakoram tract linking China and Pakistan) while China claims the Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh. What seems to have happened is that the Chinese side has insisted on discussing Arunachal Pradesh first before turning to the question of the Aksai Chin area. This – if it is true — would render things much more complicated and rule out any settlement of the dispute for quite some time.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bertil Lintner series in Asian Times

Asian Times published a series of four articles on the Sino-Burmese borderlands by Bertil Lintner. Lintner traces the shifts in Burma’s military junta’s China policy, puts the recent decision to shelf the Mysore dam project in a geopolitical perspective, investigates the the ties between India and Burma, looks in to the role of the US, and comments on the most recent developments in the ongoing conflict between the Kachin Army and the Burmese military. Good read.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment

Strategic rail links, ambitious plans, and a broken promise

Last week, Delhi announced massive plans for three new railway lines in the state of Arunachal Pradesh, clearly as a response the extension of the Lhasa railway to Nyingtri and thereby unconfortably close to the disputed border between China and India. One of the new Arunachal railway lines will link Tawang (elevation 3,500 m) to the plains of Assam.

Yesterday, Syed Zarir Hussain reported that the Indian railway plans meet with mixed responses in Arunachal Pradesh:

promises have often been made to be broken – a Rs.125 billion Trans-Arunachal Highway announced by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2008 and expected to be completed by 2013 was shelved before it took off without any reasons cited.

“What we need are projects by New Delhi that could uplift the economic condition of the locals rather than trying to set up infrastructure purely for strategic reasons,” said Bamang Felix, a local civil rights campaigner.

(via TwoCircles.net)

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , , | Leave a comment