Posts tagged Xinjiang

What happened in Xinjiang?

On 29 December, Xinhua reported that seven “terrorists” were shot by police in Western Xinjiang after “kidnapping” two herders. Edward Wong put together all that is known in his piece for the New York Times on 1 January 2012 (I only found it now):

In the new report, Radio Free Asia said on Friday that four of the people detained after the confrontation in a mountainous area of Xinjiang were children, ages 7 to 17, and that they had been part of a group trying to flee the country to escape repression.

A report on Thursday by Xinhua, the state news agency, said that police officers had engaged in a shootout with 15 terrorist suspects who had abducted two people, and that seven of the suspects and one police officer had been killed. Xinhua did not specify the ethnicity of the gunmen.

An article on Friday in The Global Times, a state-run newspaper, said that a group of kidnappers had been trying to cross into Central Asia to undergo “jihadist training” and had abducted two herdsmen to force them to guide the group in Pishan County. Four of the 15 people were detained, and four others were injured, the article said.
The report by Radio Free Asia, which is financed by the United States government and has a Uighur-language service, said the group was trying to leave the country so that it could freely practice Islam, the religion of most Uighurs. The Chinese Communist Party carefully controls expressions of Islam and other religions throughout China. The report made no reference to a kidnapping and said the group had been stopped by the police on the way to the border.

More open questions than anything else.

Posted in Border Review | Tagged | Leave a comment

Han Hua on the nature of the Sino-Pakistani partnership

In a commentary for China Daily, Han Hua counters media reports about alleged tensions between Pakistan and China following the recent Xinjiang incidents:

Though it was unusual for China to say that the Kashgar rioters had received training in Pakistan-based ETIM camps and terrorists’ activities in Xinjiang are a cause for concern, only the shortsighted would prophesy a rift between Beijing and Islamabad and overlook the solidity of Sino-Pakistani partnership. [...]

China has known these facts and Pakistan has been cooperating with it in the fight against terrorism. In fact, Pakistan has handed over some Uygur separatists to China.

Han Hua, associate professor at Peking University’s School of International Studies, is probably right to warn against an overinterpretation of the Kashgar government’s allegations. What still strikes me is how openly and easily seperatism and terrorism are used as synonyms.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment

William Ide: What Is the East Turkestan Islamic Movement?

William Ide, for Voice of America, reviews the diverging opinions about ETIM among experts.

Read More »

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged | Leave a comment

What happens in Xinjiang?

While the agencies (Reuters, UPI)  and news channels (Al JazeeraCNN) cobble together the bits and pieces known about the recent incidents in Xinjiang, and Indian commentators mischievously report cracks in the ‘all-weather friendship’ between Pakistan and China because of alleged terrorist training camps in Pakistan, we still have no idea  about anything. Were the incidents in Hotan and Kashgar in any way linked? Is there anything that points at a political agenda? Is there any statement by the elusive Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), if it still exists as a group (what many specialists doubt according to Micheal Dillon)? Who exactly was targeted and why?

Posted in Border Review | Tagged | Leave a comment

Development plans for Xinjiang

The Economist on development plans in Xinjiang:

In Kashgar they speak of the city’s “leapfrog development”. Their model is Shenzhen, the grandfather of Chinese boom towns, on the border with Hong Kong. Kashgar, they say, is to become a trading hub and manufacturing centre that will tap markets in South and Central Asia and even Europe with a web of new roads and railways. Its new “special economic zone” (a concept pioneered by Shenzhen) will produce everything from petrochemicals and cars to halal food, they say. “In the east is Shenzhen, in the west is Kashgar,” is the new official slogan. [...]

Xinjiang Economic Daily, closely controlled by the government, reports that Kashgar’s new zone could create as many as 600,000 jobs, a staggering figure given that only 460,000 people live in the city’s core urban area. The government speaks of training thousands of Uighur peasants to help them transfer to factory work.

However, there are those who doubt that Uyghur peasants will be good factory workers:

Tang Lijiu of Urumqi’s East-West Economic Research Institute says that creating the right kind of jobs for Uighurs is the key. “Because of their lifestyle, asking them to go into big industrial production, onto the production line: they’re probably not suited to that,” says Mr Tang, who is Han Chinese. Better, he suggests, to develop something like, well, basketball. That, Mr Tang says, might work in the same way that America’s National Basketball Association creates “more job opportunities for blacks”.

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment

Henryk Szadziewski: The Uyghurs, China and Central Asia

Henryk Szadziewski for openDemocracy on the problems Uyghurs face in Central Asia:

The post-Soviet era and the years of “war on terror” have seen the consolidation of authoritarian regimes in central Asia, punctured by episodes of domestic conflict (as in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan). The region’s political leaders, seeking to maintain themselves in power, find China’s mix of one-party rule and economic dynamism an attractive model.  Since the establishment of the SCO, their countries’ trade with China has grown substantially. [...]

This developing economic relationship, underpinned by a shared ideology of power, equates for the Uyghurs to more repression. Uyghurs, and in particular refugees in central Asia, exist in the shadows of the international community and of transnational organisation such as the SCO. They need more protection by mandated international agencies from the reach of the Chinese state.

(Via ETH Zurich, International Relation and Security Network. Szadziewski manages the Uyghur Human Rights Project)

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment