Posts tagged Yang Houlan

Maoists agreed to controversial Lumbini plans, says Chinese envoy

A few weeks ago, Chinese foundation APEC  announced its ambitious plans to develop Lumbini into a USD 3 billion “special zone” modelled after Mecca (see previous entries under the tag Lumbini). What remained unclear was to what extent the governments of China and Nepal were involved. Today, the Times of India reports that MP Hridayesh Tripathy discussed the topic with Chinese ambassador to Nepal Yang Houlan:

In answer, the Chinese envoy, Tripathy said, replied that APEC had signed a memorandum of understanding with the tourism and civil aviation ministry and it was unfortunate that the other ministries did not know about it. The tourism ministry is headed by Maoist leader Khadga Bahadur Bishwokarma.

This sounds much more official than anybody has so far admitted.

 

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , | Leave a comment

Nepali Times Interview with Chinese Ambassador Yang Houlan

The Nepali Times asks Chinese Ambassador Yang Houlan about plans for Lumbini:

As I know, some Chinese enterprises have shown keen interest of developing Lumbini. The Chinese side is willing to support Nepal’s plan for developing Lumbini.

Very diplomatic. But people will probably still want to know what the Chinese government’s involvement was or is in those Lumbini plans.

(via Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China)

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment

Sino-Nepal courtship

The Rising Nepal Daily interviews His Excellency Yang Houlan, China’s new ambassador to Nepal. Nothing out of the ordinary. Asked about Tibet Yang answers:

Tibet is now undergoing the best period of developing in history featuring development of economy, stability of society, happiness of living and unity of all ethnic groups. And all Tibetan people, under the leadership of the Central Government and with the support of the whole country, will surely create a more brighter future.

But then, out of the blue, this:

Nepal and Tibet are close neighbors with cultural similarities, and the enthusiasm of exchanges between Nepalese and Tibetans is high. We should strengthen the friendly exchanges of culture, education, youth, women and many other fields to enhance mutual understanding.

Exchanging women to forge alliance… A typo or something lost in translation? Anyway, reminds me of Levi-Strauss.

(via Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China)

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , | Leave a comment

Bhavna Singh on China’s Nepal Focus

Bhavna Singh on the high-profile appointment of Yang Houlan as China’s ambassador to Nepal and the police crack-down on the celebration of the Dalai Lama’s birthday last week.

The major thrust for this move comes from the fact that the previous plenipotentiaries in Nepal have been unable to bring about expected results in terms of Nepal’s adherence to the one-China policy. In fact the previous few years have witnessed an escalation in anti-China protests by Tibetan activists undeterred by the Nepalese authorities. However, just the nature of high level focus by China has prompted Nepal to toe the Chinese line. What past ambassadors could not achieve happened within a month of the new ambassador’s appointment. First, at least a dozen Tibetan exiles gathered to celebrate a religious event were detained and then around 800 Tibetans who had gathered to celebrate the Dalai Lama’s birthday at the local Namgyal Middle Boarding School at Swoyambhu, Kathmandu were dispersed and some of them were arrested as well.

Although playing hard on Tibetan refugees to please China is not a new development but has rather been a common pattern since 2008, raiding a birthday party takes it indeed to a new level. What strikes me is how easily the argument that Nepal is too weak to resist Chinese demands seems to go down. China repeatedly reassured the world that she would never interfere in the internal matters of other countries. The issue of Tibetan refugees in Nepal does apparently not fall under this category.

The line between influence and interference is fuzzy, especially when power relations are so asymmetric. Remember the Chinese request to suspend ascent to Mt. Everest from the Nepal side in May 2008 in order to make sure that no Western expedition would unroll a Tibetan flag while a group of Chinese mountaineers were carrying the olympic torch to the summit? Just a neighbourly request or direct interference? Singh reminds us of that other story back in February 2011, when a recording was making the rounds in Kathmandu:

A 12-minute tape capturing a Chinese diplomat’s effort to bribe 50 Nepali legislators by offering US$ 6.9 million for help in forming a Maoist-led government that would favour China has already hampered public opinion towards China in Nepal.

(via Eurasia Review)

Posted in Border Review | Also tagged , , , | Leave a comment